Political party essay

Political party essay

Political Parties Essay,Democrats vs. Republicans Essay

WebA political party is characterized as a composed gathering of individuals with in any event generally comparative political points and sentiments, that tries to impact open WebPolitical parties are non-governmental institutions which offer direction to mass political desires. They were first established in the late 18 th century and since then they have WebEssay on American Political Parties. Good Essays. Words. 6 Pages. 1 Works Cited. Open Document. Political parties are critical structures in the modern society and WebDifferent Roles of Political Parties - Government Essay In the United States, there are three major groups and they are: political party, interest group and lobbyist, and the WebA party will thus be defined here as an organized group of people who select candidates for parliament or government by participating in elections. This is the main function, or task, ... read more

Some rights that the government can not take according to the Libertarian Party are; the right to life, the right to liberty of speech and action, and the right to property. I feel like the Libertarian Party has remained a minor force in politics because other higher power parties having more. As a current member of the conservative party, I feel the American Independent Party represents a solid platform on promoting justice and democracy in the United States. The American Independent Party started in , by founder, Bill Shearer and his wife Eileen Shearer with the intention of acknowledging a country under the protection and guidance of God as the Creator of all.

They established a set of theories and beliefs that include, but are not limited to; God given rights, duties to individuals, freedom from liberalism, the protection of life, the rights of families, individual defense and common defense. In accordance with the American Independent Party, my life would be greatly affected in ways of positive change and beneficial growth towards working together as a nation and as public servants to our government. For starters the Democratic Party supports gay marriage, abortions and supports the rights of gun ownership. They also agree to have higher tax rates and not many laws. With that said, there are many negative features that come with those privileges. An interactive system of democratic-republican constitutionalism that preserves our freedoms and promotes our moral and material progress is what is needed in our political party platform.

The ideal party combines the policies of all the four pre-existing political party, from sweeping financial reform that provides economic security for families, a broader strategic rebalancing of American foreign policy and the investment of clean air technologies. These policies allow a more efficient running government that would appeal to the people and allow a more prosperous future. Johnson in Lyndon B. Johnson of course was a Democrat. Is this quote true today? That is a question that can only be answered after a careful analysis of the philosophy of the Republican and Democratic leaders that help to run this nation. In the United States we are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum; even further divided into political parties such as Republicans, on the right, and Democrats, on the left side.

These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics such as the economy, separation of church and state, abortion, and gun control. This quote explains one of the many reasons Jefferson created the Democratic-Republic party. The Democratic-Republicans resisted the idea of a new federal constitution, they stood for states rights in opposition to a central Govt, and strict interpretation of the constitution. If we could, the people of America would vote for the Democratic-Republic party because of their stance on immigration, funding the national debt, and the Jay Treaty. The main idea of the Democratic-Republican party was, to represent the interest of the common free man. A small amount of the core ideals of libertarians has changed.

This platform has also been referred to as neoliberalism. The United States Libertarian party focuses on personal liberty, self-ownership, privacy, economic liberty, free markets, protected environments, strong national defense, and minimal war actions. The LP is supportive of gay rights, gun rights, pro-life ideals. They stand against labor unions; universal health care, restricted markets, government surveillance of citizens, and government provided security. Libertarians like to think of themselves as defensive whenever it comes to foreign policy, and to refrain from attacking unless they are.

Political parties play an important role on how the government makes decisions. In American history there are usually two major political parties at one time. These parties can be split up into two groups of beliefs for a party, Conservative and Liberal. The first form of political parties was formed during the refining of the constitution from the Articles of Confederation. These two parties are the Federalists and the anti-federalists. The next political party is the Democratic republicans who appeared during the later time of the time of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The final appearance of different political parties happened during the Antebellum period before the Civil War. Political parties are a major part of American history because depending on the views and the party holding congress and the presidency it can affect what changes and how much is done during that time.

Some Personal and economical liberties are abortion, expression of communication, education and health care. Abortion to the libertarian party is the belief that the induvial has the right to choose. Alongside they believe that we have the right to choose but will deal with the consequences later. Libertarians advocate for small government, one that is limited to protecting individuals from violence and coercion, and one that opposes bureaucracy and taxes. The focal point of the party are the values of individual liberty and autonomy. These are values our government should model their political agenda around, because I believe that I should be able to make responsible decisions without the interference of any outside force stemming from the government or another individual.

Essay Topics Writing. Home Page Research Political Party Essay. Political Party Essay Decent Essays. Open Document. Democratic Party 2. Republican Party 3. Libertarian Party 4. Green Party 5. Constitution Party 1. Democratic Party: In the s this party has favored the progressive and liberal political positions, and that they act on the Congress, in which means that they act on the debt ceiling. It is also one of the two major contemporary political parties that here in the United States. Republican Part: There are many ideas, conservatism, economic liberalism, fiscal conservatism, and social conservatism.

Libertarian Party: This party is the one that gives us individual freedom, social liberals, economic conservatives, abortion, and non-interventionist foreign policy. Green Party: The Green Party of the United States, in other words, GPUS, is …show more content… I also like how they act on the Congress. This all means that some social, environmental, and economic problems require longer-term solutions. Republican I like that there are many different parts of the party. I like that the party has many ideas, conservatism, economic liberalism, fiscal conservatism, and social conservatism. Not to mention, the third parties have a little chance, and there are fears of majority tyranny. Libertarian I like that it gives us individual freedom, social liberals, economic conservatives, and non-interventionist foreign policy.

Get Access. The rise of political parties in was caused by general distrust, disagreements on policies, and constitutional disagreements between the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties, which were led by Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, respectively. The United States began as a weak, newborn nation that grew into a large, self-supporting country with a governing body unique to this time period. As the government grew and the nation prospered, the rise of leaders and political figures came about and with this, conflicting principles and ideology spawned, thus creating the first of the political parties; the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. When George Washington left office, he warned the nation about political parties fearing they were dangerous to the way government should function.

Despite his warning, political parties developed and changed American politics forever. By definition, a political party is "a group of office holders, candidates, activists, and voters who identify with a group label and seek to elect to public office individuals who run under that label" O'Connor and Sabato The creation of political parties can be traced back to the differing views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton while they served in Washington's cabinet. Jefferson's Democratic-Republican counterpart today is the Democratic Party while Hamilton's Federalists are similar to. In , the U. did not have a two-party system. The two-party system is rooted in the beginnings of the nation itself.

The Framers of the Constitution were opposed to political parties. The ratification of the Constitution saw the birth of America's first two parties: the federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Anti-Federalists, who followed Thomas Jefferson. The nation had only had George Washington, who was President without a party at that time. Jefferson challenged Adams under the umbrella of the Democratic - Republican Party. In addition, the Democratic - Republican Party was the first real party that contained the formal beginnings of the present day two-party system. In short, the American party system began as a two-party system. In this essay I will be discussing the why America needs a two-party system, why a multi-system may work for the nation and the conflicts, and how does this political system contributes to the nation and why a two-system is worth the struggle.

There have been many different political parties since the beginning of the American political system. A political party is made up of a group of people that share common goals and ideals, and these people work together to help elect people to offices that share these goals to represent them. Political parties work to try to control the government and their ultimate goal is to win as many elections and to gain as many offices as possible. Johnson in Lyndon B. Johnson of course was a Democrat. Is this quote true today? That is a question that can only be answered after a careful analysis of the philosophy of the Republican and Democratic leaders that help to run this nation.

In the United States we are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum; even further divided into political parties such as Republicans, on the right, and Democrats, on the left side. These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics such as the economy, separation of church and state, abortion, and gun control. All across the world there are major political parties fighting in each country in order to take control of their government. The United States of America is not an exception, as the Democratic and Republican parties compete against each other in every election in order to gain control of the US Government.

These two political parties are the most popular and powerful in the US, there are very popular that other political parties have no chance on competing against these two in an election race. In order to win elections the parties need the vote of the people, the parties need for every gender to vote for them in order to have a chance in winning the election. Both parties need the vote of the men and woman, but these genders tend to vote. In recent discussion of Democrats and Republican parties, a controversial issue has been whether or not the U.

should expand their options from more than a two party system. On the one hand, some argue that there should be more choices other than between the two Democrat Party and Republican Party. From this perspective, voters have more of a variety when they vote. On the other hand, some argue that the U. should remain as a two party system. In sum, then, the issue is whether there should be other options rather than a choice between the Democrat and the Republican Party. Since the administration of George Washington two political parties have dominated the United States political system, but they have not always been the same two parties.

The first two parties were the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists were those who supported a strong federal government and the Anti-Federalists were those who did not. The leaders of the Federalists were Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Both were from the Northeast where the Federalist line of thinking was strongest. Thomas Jefferson became the leader of the Anti-Federalists. These two groups really did not considered themselves parties. The founders feared parties because they thought of them as factions. Essay Topics Writing. Home Page Research Essay on American Political Parties. Essay on American Political Parties Good Essays. Open Document. Political parties are critical structures in the modern society and universal phenomena in most democracies.

In fact, they form major objects of intensive study as they are usually the centre of political and social power. They engage in most activities that are of significant consequence in the lives of citizens and link the common populace to the government. Therefore, it is important to understand political parties fully from every perspective of political systems so obtain their real importance in democracies. A political party is basically a group of citizens who converge as voters, activists, electoral candidates and office holders with a common party label and seek to elect party members into public offices.

While modern political …show more content… The political system of America is very different from other developed and developing democracies. Most notable is the increased power bestowed on the upper house of the parliament, the extensive power held by the Supreme Court and the dominance demonstrated by only two major parties. In this democracy, people are under the US Constitution of the governmental system as well as state government and other units of local government. Local government entails counties, districts and municipalities. The evolution of the American political party system has come a long way; with Hamilton and Jefferson being regarded as the founder fathers of the modern party system.

These were heads of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist groups in the 18th century of American politics. Ever since, the country has maintained a party system that has two main parties that are relatively stable. These are Democrats and Republicans and have remained in contest for election every time since the presidential elections.

Political parties have been described as the core institutions of democracy and necessary for its flourishing. Such claims echo earlier statements about democracy as unthinkable without parties. Even if the way in which parties function has received severe criticism, there is also a widespread consensus that parties are necessary and that it is difficult to imagine democracy without them. Hence, representative democracy has become the norm and a decline of parties is seen as detrimental to democracy.

Understanding of what is meant by a party must be established before entering the debate on whether and how parties have changed. A minimal concept of a party entails a certain level of organization, a more or less coherent program, and a procedure to select representatives. A number of functions can then be added to this. These, however, are not strictly necessary to speak of a party, yet this does not imply that a party is explained from the functions performed, or its absence if certain functions are not performed. Most authors mention recruitment, aggregation, and mobilization as functions.

In addition, parties have to find a balance between the goals of votes, office, and policy. This would mean that a party typically is defined by these goals simultaneously: winning elections, gaining representation, and being in government. Burke importantly assumes that parties strive for the same goals i. Hence, contrary to Burke, Morse claims that parties pursue their own objectives. These objectives are, first, distinguishing themselves from their competitors and, second, gaining a large share of the popular vote. The well-known critiques of parties from Moisey Ostrogorski and Robert Michels give another twist to this debate on general versus specific interests.

Both authors focus in particular on how parties operate as organizations and with what effects. After World War II — , the discussion on the nature of parties reemerged, but it was more oriented toward conceptualization—especially the necessary features to speak of a party. This led to various typologies of parties and party models. More recently, other types of parties have been put forward, like cartel parties and business-firm parties, where membership is less important and resources are derived from state subsidies or individual donations. Joseph La Palombara and Myron Weiner define parties by a certain level of organization locally and nationally and by their office-seeking and vote-seeking characteristics.

This conceptual and empirical development tends to blur the difference between what parties are and what parties do. A party will thus be defined here as an organized group of people who select candidates for parliament or government by participating in elections. This is the main function, or task, that sets parties apart from social movements, trade unions, or interest groups. Parties may perform all other functions, but they are not exclusive for a party. In his discussion of the role of parties in the political system, Morse distinguishes two main functions of political parties: the education and organization of public opinion, and the administration of government. Moreover, he introduces what has later become known as the linkage function of parties, or the integration of interests.

His contemporary, Lord Bryce, distinguishes five functions. All parties share four of these functions: union keeping the party together , recruitment bringing in new voters , enthusiasm exciting and rousing voters , and instruction informing and educating voters. Interestingly, Bryce argues that a fifth function, the selection of party candidates, is rather unimportant for European parties, while it is central to American parties. Whilst being critical toward the functionalist approach, he does not suggest to do away with the study of functions altogether, but rather turns this into an agenda for empirical research.

First, if certain hypothesized consequences are absent, one might believe that the party is not present. Second, there is the risk of inferring the existence of a party from the presence of the consequences—a general critique of functionalism. In spite of these critical notes, party functions have remained central to analyzing parties. In fact, many authors have incorporated the objections raised, but as Russell Dalton and Martin Wattenberg argue, it is a functional rather than a functionalist approach. Party functions are used to measure what parties do, but functions are not seen as the constituting or defining elements of what a party is.

Party functions become tools to measure change, transformation, or adaptation of parties, thus following King in his advice not only to draw up a list of party functions, but also to critically examine if and when parties carry out these functions. Table 1 presents an overview of the functions that several authors have ascribed to parties. This is no surprise: if the environment of parties changes, new functions may emerge while others become less relevant. One example of this is the education, or information, function, which was crucial for scholars at the end of the nineteenth century, then moved into the background for a long period, but recently reappeared in a different form in an era of mass media and modern technology.

Blondel speaks of mechanisms and institutions and refers to specific tasks that parties fulfill: handling conflicts and formulating policies. This inventory is parsimonious, as it leaves out specific reference to vote structuring, mobilization, and organization of government. On the whole, there is a striking congruence from the s onwards. Most scholars assume that parties still perform roughly the same functions as they did thirty or forty years ago, even if the balance between these functions may have altered. On the basis of this overview, there are three essential functions:. This list contains functions related to both representation and governance, while it also refers to the tasks of a party in policy making and during elections. The functions emphasize the link between parties and voters, and the competition between parties.

Finally, they allow for comparative analysis over time and across countries. A perennial debate concerns how parties have developed and continue to be omnipresent in Western democracies. Moreover, in many countries, parties have also been instrumental in the transition toward democracy and in providing legitimacy after its establishment. In addition, the authors see no credible alternative to parties, which begs the question of what happens to democracy if parties no longer perform this political and institutional integration. After parties were regarded as indispensable for making democracy work. The general idea that parties are essential for democracy still stands fast.

In other words, parties and democracy are seen as inseparable. The often observed lower levels of trust in parties indicates this decline. Montero and Gunther point at a paradox in the party literature: an increased attention for parties at the end of the s accompanies a claim that parties are in decline. American scholars such as Tim Aldrich have been more alert in this respect, contrary to scholars in Western Europe. Yet, Hans Daalder in mentions possible causes of party decline as:. In summary, it is argued that parties cannot exist or ought not exist anymore.

The first line of reasoning relates to what Daalder labels the redundancy of parties, while the second is seen as a result of distrusting parties. First, there is over adaptation, and parties are not vehicles for change but enhance the status quo. Second, overgeneralization causes parties to no longer represent specific interests. Third, over institutionalization broadens the gap between citizens and parties. This party failure would explain the lower rates of electoral participation and of dealignment of voters across Europe and the United States. He argues that how parties present themselves to the electorate and the way they compete makes it increasingly difficult for voters to find ideological differences, or understand how these differences relate to their own interests.

For the second element, party functions, Mair makes distinguishes representative and procedural functions and argues that the former type of functions—integrating and mobilizing the citizenry, articulating and integrating interests, and formulating public policy—have been drastically reduced. Conversely, the procedural functions—recruitment of candidates for office, organization of parliament and government— have remained important and may even gain significance. Thus, parties are changing from representative agencies into governing agencies: they have become parties of the state and are less part of society. Aldrich considers the problem as emanating from a paradox where parties no longer match collective choice and related action by means of collective decision making.

Hence, parties and their representatives are no longer capable to represent or to govern. The conclusion can be drawn that the term party crisis concerns, in particular, the representative functions of parties. First, parties are less relevant for the information, education, and mobilization of the electorate. The role of cyberspace is but one example of how new technologies absorb this function. Second, parties are less successful in integrating interests. This problem relates both to the apparent inability of parties to adapt to new societal concerns and demands for other forms of participation, and the vanishing of ideological differences. Third, this development reinforces electoral volatility in many countries and points to processes of dealignment and realignment of individual voters vis-à-vis established parties or even departing from political life altogether.

There are three flaws in the debate surrounding party crisis, or party decline. First, using the term party crisis implies a view on what a party is, or a standard against which parties can be judged. Yet, it is unclear what this standard should be, and whether or not such a standard might well be contextually dynamic. Paul Webb qualifies the arguments about party crisis in a very succinct way:. Many authors tend to link the citizenry with the state as the crucial function of parties and from such a perspective, any loosening of this linkage is seen as decline. Yet, considering all party functions equal implies that a shift from representative functions to recruitment and governance is not the same as decline.

Katz and Mair show that the main drawback of this perspective is that relations between parties and the state are ignored. Speaking of decline or failure is misconceived, and they see change as few signs that the role of parties has really diminished. The third flaw in this type of reasoning is its emphasis on stability: it suggests that a party should remain more or less the same over time. Yet, the ability to change and adapt—to attract new groups of voters, to change the internal organization, or to renew the party ideology—can also be seen positively.

In a traditional view—putting the citizen-party linkage at the center—this is, however, seen as party decline. Trends of increasing electoral volatility and decreasing membership demonstrate that fewer people identify strongly with one particular party, and that voters are increasingly volatile. Yet, calling this party decline is biased toward the status quo. Several other authors have also consistently qualified the arguments of party crisis or party decline. Daalder is therefore right in warning against writing off parties too hastily, and he makes a plea in favor of analyzing their actual functions and how these may change.

The challenge is to understand to what extent there is a response to external factors and in how far it signifies a deliberate strategy of parties. Thus, the adequate picture that emerges is not so much crisis or decline, but rather a transformation of how parties shift attention to different functions. A potential answer to the question of party survival is offered by the cartel thesis. Parties move away from civil society and become part of the state, which is the vital point of the cartel model. Some parties may disappear, other parties may emerge, but the organizations as such and the party systems in which they function stay put. Hence, both functional and evolutionary arguments are acknowledged: parties are necessary for the functioning of democracy, and they manage to adapt to new circumstances.

This example Political Parties Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services. com offers reliable custom essay writing services that can help you to receive high grades and impress your professors with the quality of each essay or research paper you hand in.

Political Party Essay,Related topics

WebDifferent Roles of Political Parties - Government Essay In the United States, there are three major groups and they are: political party, interest group and lobbyist, and the WebEssay on American Political Parties. Good Essays. Words. 6 Pages. 1 Works Cited. Open Document. Political parties are critical structures in the modern society and WebIn definition, a political party is a legally organized group of individuals or people who have similar opinions and control the governing of a country. Long before political parties in WebIntroduction In the modern time political party has many important role of pre-condition of democratic system. They show a crucial link among society, various institutions of WebA political party is characterized as a composed gathering of individuals with in any event generally comparative political points and sentiments, that tries to impact open WebA party will thus be defined here as an organized group of people who select candidates for parliament or government by participating in elections. This is the main function, or task, ... read more

A political party is basically a group of citizens who converge as voters, activists, electoral candidates and office holders with a common party label and seek to elect party members into public offices. A political party is made up of a group of people that share common goals and ideals, and these people work together to help elect people to offices that share these goals to represent them. Promo code: cd1a It is just not realistic to have such conservative ideas in a time such as. Libertarians advocate for small government, one that is limited to protecting individuals from violence and coercion, and one that opposes bureaucracy and taxes.

Issues of government powers, the free market, gun control, abortion, political party essay, welfare, education, taxes, separation of church and state along with a multitude of other factors that not only invade our personal lives but our society as a whole makes defining America as a free country and determining personal rights quite a challenge. Democrat Party vs. As the government grew and the nation prospered, the political party essay of leaders and political figures came about and with this, conflicting principles and ideology spawned, thus creating the first of the political parties; the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Explains that proportional representation gives a more realistic image of citizens' political views as it takes all votes into account when determining the layout of the legislature. middle of paper Essay On Third Party Candidates. Presently, the american community is shifting in circumstances, ideals, practices, and beliefs every single day, political party essay.